Venezuelans are eager to participate in the upcoming presidential election on July 28, motivated by a pressing desire for change amidst the ongoing crisis. However, issues surrounding the electoral integrity are raising concerns. The revocation of an invitation to the European Union to send an observation mission by Venezuela’s National Electoral Council, coupled with Colombia and Brazil’s decisions not to send observers, casts doubt on the fairness of the process. The United Nations and the Carter Center have yet to confirm their participation. Independent observers play a crucial role in providing safety and credibility, particularly in light of the controversial 2018 election, which was labeled a “sham” by the U.S. G7 leaders have urged President Maduro’s regime to allow a comprehensive international electoral observation mission to ensure competitive and inclusive elections. Despite these appeals, the Venezuelan government has imposed significant obstacles to voting, both domestically and for the diaspora. Consular offices have made it nearly impossible for Venezuelans abroad to register, with very few of the 4 million eligible expatriates able to vote. Similar challenges are faced by voters within Venezuela due to logistical issues and targeted repression. Venezuela’s large diaspora could significantly influence the election outcome by encouraging domestic family members to vote. The government seeks international legitimacy, making the role of independent observers crucial, even if the elections are unlikely to be entirely free or fair. Observers must ensure transparent and credible reporting, which is vital for assessing the election’s legitimacy. The electoral process is seen as a critical juncture for Venezuela’s future and requires delicate navigation of the political landscape. According to polls, a significant majority of Venezuelans support amnesty for key figures in the current government if it facilitates change. Thus, candidates, particularly Edmundo González Urrutia, must balance the push for democratic change with negotiating post-election scenarios to maintain political stability in Venezuela.

These elections have been organised under better electoral conditions compared to previous processes, including through a renewed National Electoral Council widely seen as the most balanced of the last 20 years. However, the Mission observed structural deficiencies, such as arbitrary political disqualification of candidates, unequal access to the media and the extensive use of state resources during the electoral campaign. Full Text-> EEAS.Europe

Versión en español -> Estas elecciones fueron organizadas bajo mejores condiciones en comparación con procesos anteriores, incluido un Consejo Nacional Electoral ampliamente considerado como el más equilibrado de los últimos 20 años en Venezuela. No obstante, la Misión observó deficiencias estructurales, como inhabilitaciones políticas arbitrarias de candidatos, acceso inequitativo a los medios de comunicación y un uso extensivo de los recursos del Estado durante la campaña política. Texto Completo -> EEAS.Europe